[firedrake] Matrix multiplication in bilinear form

Lawrence Mitchell lawrence.mitchell at imperial.ac.uk
Wed Nov 11 12:11:37 GMT 2015


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/11/15 12:02, Anna Kalogirou wrote:
> Also, I don't really understand what the difference is between
> forming the matrix or taking its action...


So if you form the matrix, then you have A, and you can do things like
explicitly compute its inverse (using LU, say).

If you only give me the action, you don't have A, you just give me a
recipe for computing Ax if I give you x.  In this case, I don't know
what the entries of A are (so I can't explicitly compute its inverse).

Lawrence
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWQzB5AAoJECOc1kQ8PEYvugEIAPEyk/4lVpt1f0G/NSnoPOoX
DK4FD+Kjydg+h2sKWx8U0wyIJEvh442vQ3wgtWj+iNVrt9MG8i2dMADUZugvYnc0
IUqLLE8AvHBkLY0++8qe2MPw4tCeX/r09OB3hMXo/39R//KjK3RnRGd0WNe7xncn
aJC/1VrfJqxmJvyzYFps5bBIloTA+Gz6C3XZyr44k0xpjQRFnPBgIGp0AXBtVmei
cXA1k/3F4TUrA1jFjNC1cNODtrI4V1+Hi9Amgs6XWj5Prk/370dC3sGDGeAO0x2i
UH7LVPgsdFo6vsAF0TjOa8zQWEhvw7Iuhx//CtArIO3/dGen3gVQ0CMhVALntSY=
=OLyo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



More information about the firedrake mailing list