[klee-dev] KLEE behaviour with function call to uclibc
Shehbaz Jaffer
shehbaz.jaffer at mail.utoronto.ca
Sun May 28 00:55:05 BST 2017
Hi Dan,
Thank you for your reply. However, I am struggling with how function not defined in the programs bitcode (like getopt_long function) gets emulated by KLEE. Please allow me to explain the steps and where I am facing issues in more detail:
I extracted bc from executable of "groups" program in coreutils library, as explained in the official documentation [1]. when I disassembled the resultant bitcode (from groups.bc to groups.ll), I can see only the function declaration of getopt_long and not the entire definition. Since KLEE gets only the groups bitcode as an input (groups.bc) which does not contain the getopt_long definition, how is KLEE able to run all if-else inside the getopt_long function? What does KLEE take as an input that lets KLEE know the definition of getopt_long. I looked at the referenced code [2] however it explains the KLEE parameter initialization only. I would like to know how function calls to "missing functions" - or functions that do not have definitions in bitcode - such as those in uclibc are emulated by KLEE.
Code pertaining to disassembled groups.ll file
# call getopt_long
%call4 = tail call i32 @getopt_long(i32 %argc, i8** %argv, i8* getelementptr inbounds ([1 x i8]* @.str6, i64 0, i64 0), %struct.option* getelementptr inbounds ([3 x %struct.option]* @longopts, i64 0, i64 0), i32* null) #9, !dbg !1788
#declare getopt_long
; Function Attrs: nounwind
declare i32 @getopt_long(i32, i8**, i8*, %struct.option*, i32*) #2
I could not find getopt_long definition in the .ll file corresponding to extracted .bc file. Please advise.
Thanks,
Shehbaz
[1] http://klee.github.io/docs/coreutils-experiments/
[2] https://github.com/klee/klee/blob/bec4ceafe412a08de303678581e07451a1399e1f/runtime/POSIX/klee_init_env.c#L85
________________________________
From: Dan Liew <dan at su-root.co.uk>
Sent: Saturday, May 27, 2017 4:12:24 AM
To: Shehbaz Jaffer
Cc: klee-dev at imperial.ac.uk
Subject: Re: [klee-dev] KLEE behaviour with function call to uclibc
On 27 May 2017 at 01:36, Shehbaz Jaffer <shehbaz.jaffer at mail.utoronto.ca> wrote:
> Hello KLEE developers,
>
> I am trying to understand how KLEE emulates environment variables. In particular, how do functions like getopt_long get executed with KLEE, when we give --sym-arg as an argument. getopt_long is found in unistd.h, and is available in uclibc. For a coreutils file like groups.c where the following line is encountered:
>
> while ((optc = getopt_long (argc, argv, "", longopts, NULL)) != -1)
>
> how would KLEE generate different inputs? for simplicity, consider the case where we use --sym-arg 1 10 as a command line argument which leads to argv[1] becoming a symbolic buffer of size 10, if my understanding is correct, when getopt_long is called, one of the two things can happen:
>
> 1) argv[1] is declared as a symbolic buffer, we explore all paths of getopt_long code in uclibc library, so all different if's / elses in getopt_long code will get forked and execute to give different optc values.
> 2) getopt_long is skipped, optc variable is made symbolic, and the main function in groups.c treats optc as symbolic value. on any successive if/else condition in groups.c containing optc, a new state is forked with new value of optc.
Take a look at the `klee_init_env()` function [1]. When KLEE is called
with --posix-runtime the program's `main()` is rewritten to call
`klee_init_env()` at the beginning and change `argc` and `argv`.
The `klee_init_env()` function introduces symbolic arguments if
requested. From that point onwards execution of the program just
proceeds as normal so `getopt_long()` will just be interpreted by KLEE
just like any other function.
[1] https://github.com/klee/klee/blob/bec4ceafe412a08de303678581e07451a1399e1f/runtime/POSIX/klee_init_env.c#L85
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
More information about the klee-dev
mailing list