various issues

[David Megginson]

Peter Murray-Rust writes:

 > The major problem is namespace collisions between ElementTypes.
 > Does anyone have a solution?  What if the incompatible document is
 > in a separate valid document (i.e. with DOCTYPE).  I'd value
 > ideas/epxerience here, otherwise we will have to produce some
 > kludge.

The solution is to define tables (etc.) as base architectures, and
then to map specific DTDs using architectural forms, something like
this:

  <?ArcBase xmlTable>

  [notation and entity declarations omitted]

  <!ELEMENT table     (tr+)>
  <!ATTLIST table
    xmlTable #FIXED "xmlTable">

  <!ELEMENT tr        (tc+)>
  <!ATTLIST tr
    xmlTable #FIXED "xmlTableRow">

  <!ELEMENT tc        (#PCDATA)>
  <!ATTLIST tc
    xmlTable #FIXED "xmlTableCell">

Presto -- no element-type-name collisions!


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 ak117 at freenet.carleton.ca
Microstar Software Ltd.         dmeggins at microstar.com
University of Ottawa            dmeggins at uottawa.ca
        http://www.uottawa.ca/~dmeggins

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa at ic.ac.uk)