crism at ora.com
Mon Dec 15 15:44:23 GMT 1997
> I notice that the current draft has switched the case of the XML
> declaration and its arguments to lower case:
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> Now that case is significant, this presumably matters.
Absolutely. Note the disappearance of the "match/exactly match"
dichotomy from the terminology section of the specification; *all*
matches must be exact.
> Is there a particular reason for this?
It was a posted WG decision to use lower-case for all possible
> Other PIs will have a PItarget where 'xml' sits, and this isn't
> constrained to be any particular case.
Which ones? The WG-produced specifications will use lower-case, and
other applications are forbidden from using [Xx][Mm][Ll] per the prose
in the section on names.
> Wouldn't it be kinder to make it '<?' ('XML'|'xml') ... ?!
Not really. It was introduce an instance of case-insensitivity into
an otherwise completely case-sensitive specification, making education
> (The DTD declarations (<!ELEMENT, etc.) remain in upper case,
> presumably for compatibility with what SGML systems produce.)
Not for compatibility - it's required by ISO 8879. The NAMECASE
GENERAL NO parameter in the SGML declaration only affects processing
of the DTD and document instance; keywords declared in the declaration
itself are still folded to upper case. This means that any such
keywords (like ELEMENT, DOCTYPE, ATTLIST, NOTATION) must be uppercase.
<!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN">
<!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN"
<USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek>
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev