Eve L. Maler
elm at arbortext.com
Mon Dec 15 19:08:53 GMT 1997
At 02:02 PM 12/15/97 -0500, Ingo Macherius wrote:
>> > <http://www.scripting.com/siteChanges.xml>
>> It is not valid XML, because of 3 things:
>More exact: It is neither well-formed nor valid XML ...
>> 1) the <?XML version="1.0"> PI is missing.
>Ouch. This is not well-formed at all.
>Use <?xml version="1.0"> as to the latest PR.
Note that the XML declaration PI isn't strictly required (though it's
recommended), so it's not a WF error for it to be missing. The other
comments you made were right on.
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev