XML application

[james anderson]

how about
<?XML version="1.0" ?>

i've yet to understand why, but isn't that the way it needs to be?

Ingo Macherius wrote:

> > >      <http://www.scripting.com/siteChanges.xml>
>
> > It is not valid XML, because of 3 things:
> More exact: It is neither well-formed nor valid XML ...
>
> > 1)  the <?XML version="1.0"> PI is missing.
>
> Ouch. This is not well-formed at all.
> Use <?xml version="1.0"> as to the latest PR.
>
>         ++im
>


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mailman.ic.ac.uk/pipermail/xml-dev/attachments/19971216/0022ebb0/attachment.htm