element content vs. element attribute
David Megginson
ak117 at freenet.carleton.ca
Sun Dec 21 11:58:20 GMT 1997
Ray Waldin writes:
> In other words, when should data be contained by elements? Or
> conversely, when should data be an attribute of an element instead
> of contained by that element?
Here's a good, general distinction:
* use elements for structurally-significant information; and
* use attributes for meta-data.
One problem, that will become more obvious when more XML tools are
available, is that most WYSIWYMG (M="might" or "may") XML editing
software will like show character data (element content) on the screen
by default, but will show attributes only on request, possible in a
pop-up dialog. It makes sense to have the most important information
(the real content) inside elements, then, and to have the meta-data
out of the way in attributes.
(Peter: how do you display attributes in Jumbo?)
Of course, what is and isn't meta-data will vary depending on the
document type, but here are some common examples:
* a unique identifier
* a security level
* a revision or release level
* rendition information (yech)
* configuration information
* the preferred unit of measurement
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson ak117 at freenet.carleton.ca
Microstar Software Ltd. dmeggins at microstar.com
http://home.sprynet.com/sprynet/dmeggins/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev
mailing list