lex, yacc, and xml

[Ward Harold]

<question name="why hand code parsers" class="potentially stupid">
Why is it that all of the XML parsers/processors I've seen appear to be
hand coded rather than generated via lex/yacc or flex/bison? I seem to
recall seeing something to the effect that yacc/bison can't handle the
class of grammar that XML falls into. Then again I'm not a compiler
constructor, opted for the AI sequence in graduate school, so I may be
imagining things. Even if there is a technical reason for eschewing
parser generation surely the basic lexing and scanning could be done
with lex/flex, no?
</question>

<signature name="Ward K. Harold" address="ward.harold at tivoli.com"/>


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)