SAX-J and the DPH (DJH?)
crism at ora.com
Tue Dec 30 15:30:30 GMT 1997
> I am wondering where XML-Devers see SAX-J relative to DPH?.
By definition, the DPH isn't going to have much to do with SAX-J.
However, you raise a good point; the SAX-J folks should decide whether
an identity transform is a goal, and if so, comments need to be
included. If not, then SAX-J is not an appropriate tool to use for
> He is the guy staring at 10GB of corporate XML docs and just wants
> to change
> throughout the whole lot. If he uses SAX-J he blows all the
> aide-memoires stuffed into his comments? He also blows his CDATA
> marked sections. Is the DPH destined to always use a fully blown
> parser to output XML?
Hell, no! He'd be a fool to use Java for this when
s/555-1234/555-4321/g will do the trick. (I suspect that in any
real-world situation like this, *all* numbers would want to be
changed, but if not, just include the markup in the sed command.)
<!NOTATION SGML.Geek PUBLIC "-//Anonymous//NOTATION SGML Geek//EN">
<!ENTITY crism PUBLIC "-//O'Reilly//NONSGML Christopher R. Maden//EN"
<USMAIL>90 Sherman Street, Cambridge, MA 02140 USA" NDATA SGML.Geek>
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev