Suggested List Protocol

Gavin Nicol gtn at
Wed Feb 26 16:02:38 GMT 1997

>Second that.  The lack of this and a *standard* way to define 
>the parser output (eg., what esis should do but doesn't, and 
>grove/grove plans can do) have plagued SGML systems for years.
>A proposal for this is something that can be worked on a 
>development list.

Quite. I think we can model these objects in a number of ways
though. I would personally like to define the objects in IDL
*and* SGML... (for information on IDL etc. look at

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as:
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo at the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa at

More information about the Xml-dev mailing list