Suggested List Protocol

[Gavin Nicol]

>Second that.  The lack of this and a *standard* way to define 
>the parser output (eg., what esis should do but doesn't, and 
>grove/grove plans can do) have plagued SGML systems for years.
>A proposal for this is something that can be worked on a 
>development list.

Quite. I think we can model these objects in a number of ways
though. I would personally like to define the objects in IDL
*and* SGML... (for information on IDL etc. look at www.omg.org).



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa at ic.ac.uk)