XML API specification

[Gavin Nicol]

>>I think that for the *parser*, we should define an event-handling
>>interface, as it is much simpler to build certain applications
>>that way, and because you can build a tree from a stream of
>>events if you need to.
>
>yes.  Actually, it might be best to define an event interface (similar to
>SP?) first, and then define a grove interface.  In terms if
>test-implimentations, that means we could build an general event->grove
>module which could be used on any (conforming) event generating parser

Yes. It is also possible to validate the *parser* implementation based
soley upon the event-stream.


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa at ic.ac.uk)