Which style first ? Re: Associating DSSSL style sheets with documents

ksaito at flab.fujitsu.co.jp ksaito at flab.fujitsu.co.jp
Mon Mar 10 05:00:15 GMT 1997

James Clark <jjc at jclark.com> wrote...

>I don't think it's safe to assume that an entity is intended to be be used
>as a style sheet for some document simply because it is declared in the
>document with a style sheet notation. Suppose for example, somebody was
>writing a book about DSSSL: they might declare each of their example style
>sheets as being entities with the DSSSL notation.

Thank you for your suggestion. 

In your first example, that DSSSL book author does not use that example as
DSSSL style-sheet. What he want to say in NOTAION is "This is DSSSL file".
I think, about our idea, style-sheet entity's notation should mean
"THIS IS STYLE-SHEET which described in DSSSL". This idea needs STYLE-SHEET 

About this, 

lee at sq.com wrote ( thank you for your suggetion),
>We don't clearly distinguish between the type of an object (e.g.
>its data format, as determined by NOTATION or Mime Media Type) and
>our intended use of it.

Using NOTATION as intention for use of entity is not so good in SGML?

I recongnize our idea's weak points by your suggentions. What I like
my idea is no SGML extentions is not need. All of this idea is application

富士通研究所 明石研 情報サービス研究部
斉藤 一実

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To unsubscribe, send to majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
unsubscribe xml-dev
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (rzepa at ic.ac.uk)

More information about the Xml-dev mailing list