An incompatible CData idea

[Jarle Stabell]

Explicit CData Marker

Instead of having to confront a DTD in order to find out whether an
element(type) is CData or not, I feel it would be better if this info were
explicit in the document instance.
F.i. by adding a special CData symbol at the end of the start-tag if one
wants its content treated as CData.
If the symbol is present, the content is "plain/unstructured" text (CData),
if it's not, the content is tagged/structured text (Mixed/PCData).

Example: (Here the symbol '*' is used to indicate CData)

<MyText>This is not CData, <MyText*>but this is! Here I can write &, <,
<element> or whatever I want without being concerned about clashing with
other "magic" symbols until the end-tag.</MyText></MyText>


(Perhaps it also would be natural to have a special signal at the end-tag
as well as at the start-tag.)


Pro:
* Easy for the user, no need to remember/have DTD knowledge about
CData/PCData when reading or writing a document without DTD-aware tools.

* Easy for the parser (for the same reason)

Con:
* Incompatible with SGML


Sorry if suggestions like these already have been debated (perhaps decades
ago!) and turned down.


Cheers,
Jarle Stabell


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)