XML-Data: advantages over DTD syntax?

[Michael Leventhal]

At 09:46 AM 9/29/97 -0400, Paul Madsen wrote:
>But what does this gain us? What deficiencies with the DTD formalism does it
>address? 
>
>Is it the ability to extend object types so that one class of object is a
>specialization of another more general class? 

IMHO, this is a strong reason to chuck DTDs as they now exist.  But not
a goal of XML-DATA.

>Do not Architectural forms provide the traditional DTD syntax just that
>ability? 

So say some but not really.

Michael Leventhal

______________________________________________________________________
  Michael Leventhal           Internet  : http://www.grif.com
  G R I F , S. A.             Email     : Michael.Leventhal at grif.fr
  VP, Technology              Telephone : 510-444-2962
  1800 Lake Shore Ave Ste 14  Fax       : 510-444-1672
  Oakland, California  94606  France    : (011) 33 1 30121430 (fr US)
______________________________________________________________________

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)