SAX: New Idea for Entity Resolution

James Clark jjc at jclark.com
Sat Apr 18 04:50:51 BST 1998


David Megginson wrote:

> * Both Byte and Character streams
> 
>   Pro: - keeps everyone happy
> 
>   Con: - requires more interfaces
>        - requires another method in the Parser interface
>        - requires a new SAX class encapsulating a ByteStream and its
>          recommended encoding (or perhaps the ByteStream interface
>          will have a getEncoding() method)
>        - will greatly complicate the EntityResolver mechanism (the
>          application will need to be able to return a byte stream _or_
>          a character stream -- how could I handle this?)

You could just have a class that encapsulates a structure with three
members:

- a CharacterStream
- a ByteStream
- a String

At least one of the CharacterStream and ByteStream must be non-null. If
the ByteStream is non-null the String can specify the encoding.

James



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)




More information about the Xml-dev mailing list