SAX 1.0beta

John Wilson tug at
Mon Apr 27 15:27:57 BST 1998

Lars Marius Garshol wrote:
>> and this should be implemented in the JAR file manifest.

>That's perhaps not the best way, since it is so Java-specific.

Yes, though none of this would preclude adding explicit version enquiry
methods to the SAX interface.

Consider this as a proposal for how the Java version might be packaged. Java
parsers could safely use java.lang.Package.isCompatibleWith()  as they
_know_ that they are written in Java and are talking to a Java package.

John Wilson
The Wilson Partnership
5 Market Hill, Whitchurch, Aylesbury, Bucks HP22 4JB, UK
+44 1296 641072, +44 976 611010(mobile), +44 1296 641874(fax)
Mailto: tug at

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at
Archived as:
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at

More information about the Xml-dev mailing list