Deterministic behavior in processors

Tim Bray tbray at textuality.com
Wed Aug 5 16:01:27 BST 1998


At 12:09 AM 8/5/98 -0700, Joel Nava wrote:
>This idea of specifying the use of a validating processor over the
>wire got me to wonder what method(s) would be preferable for doing
>so. Any suggestions?

Now there's a good question.  At the moment, we have no mechanism aside
from a prominent notice on the website/marketing-material/tech-doc saying

"output from the MegaSoft XML-frobnosticator v7.4 in general uses
 external entities, and thus a validating processor is required to
 process it"

or

"output from the MicroCorp XML-depullulizer v0.3 does not use
 external entities and may be processed correctly by a non-validating
 XML processor"

David Singer of IBM at one time suggested that we bless another 
PI or something in the XML declaration, saying

<?xml version="1.0" extentities="no" ?>

which is an assertion that no external entities are used. -Tim


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)




More information about the Xml-dev mailing list