Namespaces: silly question
SimonStL at classic.msn.com
Fri Aug 7 15:54:11 BST 1998
Lars Marius Garshol writes:
> I can't imagine that the XML WG has failed to think of this, so if
> some kind soul could point out what I have failed to think of here I
> would be most grateful. Thanks.
And David Megginson writes:
>Neither the original nor the new version of the namespaces spec was
>designed to deal with DTD composition. It is possible to write a DTD
>that deals with specific, constrained uses of namespaces (and even
>hides the namespace machinery in #FIXED attribute values), but it is
>not possible to combine DTD fragments arbitrarily.
This may be an area in which XSchema, which is still evolving to meet the
needs of the namespace spec, has an advantage. ns information, as well as
prefixes, can be coded into the XSchema, making it possible for validation
against an XSchema to consider namespaces 'in the original' without having to
necessarily compromise element names or curse the existence of prefixes.
Element declarations coming up next...
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev