Namespaces and XML validation

[Lisa Rein]

peter murray rust wrote:

> 
> As I have often
> (probably boringly) said, I think my community is far more interested in
> semantic than syntactic validity. (Actually they probably don't care about
> either much...)


How can you possibly have one without the other?  If your syntax is
bogus -- you won't get far with semantics.  How can you?  

Am I wrong?  Somebody please set me straight.

lisa rein

http://www.finetuning.com

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)