Check out the DCD submission

[Tim Bray]

At 09:21 AM 8/11/98, Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
>I am primarily concerned with the basic datatypes section 4. I want to use
>these (or something like them) in CML, healthcare and so on. I shall
>extract this subset of the document and re-use the concepts in JUMBO2.

Not now!  Everyone agrees that we need datatypes.  I expect some cheerful
& constructive bloodletting in the SIG & WG as to which set of datatypes 
we need.  Anybody who invests effort in that set at this time is spinning 
wheels.

On the other hand, bearing what you say in mind, I think there may be
a sane case to be made for decoupling the task of identifying the set
of datatypes from that of defining the rest of the schema mechanics;
however we end up specifying the datatypes, the heavy typechecking
coding will be about the same, and it might be nice to give that a
head-start.

>I note that max and min have changed from being content to attributes. 

No!  Read the early part of the spec.  Per RDF, these things are 
*properties*, which can be given either as elements or attributes.
 -Tim

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)