IMPORTANT (Re: XSchema question)

[len bullard]

> Jon Bosak wrote:
> >>
> >> > Ah, but Lou got his champagne: he sold EBT for a tidy sum and is now
> >> > happily retired...

Len Bullard wrote:

> >I am reminded of stories of insider trading in which some retiring
> >gentleman trumpeted overvalued stock just prior to cashing out.

Peter M-R wrote:

> I am sure it was not meant this way, but please be absolutely scrupulous
> not to post things that could be misinterpreted and cause offence or be
> actionable.. We are a public mailing list, so this is a public utterance.

Absolutely right.  Some humor doesn't work without the smiley.  Thanks 
for minding my netiquette for me.  If Lou shares his champagne, I'll
apologize 
personally.

Thinking about compound document types.  Interesting.  If unvalidatible, 
one of the most compelling benefits of markup-based technology goes
away. 
It makes the case for XML weaker.    I understand the concern expressed 
by Dr. Goldfarb that message-oriented-markup could weaken the
capabilities of 
presentation-oriented-markup.

ADA?  Packages?  Hmm...

len

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)