Validating IDREFS...

[John Cowan]

Tyler Baker scripsit:

> Does this mean that you need to have the entire document parsed before
> you can make the check that the value of the ID matches the ID of some
> element in the document?

Yes.

> If this is true, then for validating parser implementations you will
> first need to build an in memory parse tree using a non-validating
> parser and then validate the document by recursively traversing the
> parse tree.

Not really.  All you need to keep is a list of IDs and IDREFs seen so far.
At the end of the document, they had better pair up correctly.

> I am not an SGML expert, so maybe someone here can give me some
> historical reason for why the XML spec needs to have ID's or at least
> ID's that have not previously been declared in the document when an
> IDREF is encountered.

The whole point of ID and IDREF is to have a simple intra-document
link, so that documents that have non-hierarchical natural structures
can be fitted into SGML/XML hierarchies.  For that requirement,
forward references and even loops are sometimes essential.

-- 
John Cowan					cowan at ccil.org
		e'osai ko sarji la lojban.

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)