SAX: org.xml.sax.AttributeMap

[David Megginson]

James Clark writes:

 > I agree that SAX ought to provide access to unparsed entities but I
 > don't think this is the right way to achieve it.  For a start, I can
 > have an ENTITIES attribute, so all these methods would need two
 > arguments (the index of the attribute in the attribute list, and the
 > index of the token in the value).

An excellent point, and one that I missed in the original SAX.

 > I think a better approach is for the processor at the end of the prolog
 > to pass an object to the application that provides information about all
 > the declared notations and unparsed entities.
 >
 > XP has a DTD object that does this, but it might be better to call it
 > something else (like UnparsedEntitySet) since SAX might someday be
 > extended to provide full DTD access.

This is a good idea, but I need to find a way to avoid using the
Java-specific Enumeration class that your example uses (since I've
already eliminated it from AttributeList).


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 ak117 at freenet.carleton.ca
Microstar Software Ltd.         dmeggins at microstar.com
      http://home.sprynet.com/sprynet/dmeggins/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)