David Megginson ak117 at
Sun Jan 4 15:19:46 GMT 1998

Peter Murray-Rust writes:

 > DOCTYPEs will be problematic with WF documents from more than one namespace.

Only if one particular namespace proposal is accepted.

Personally, I (and many others) believe that architectural forms
provide a much simpler, cleaner, and more powerful solution to the
namespace problem -- a document using AFs can still be validated
against a DTD, for example -- but perhaps the WG has already made up
its collective mind to the contrary.

All the best,


David Megginson                 ak117 at
Microstar Software Ltd.         dmeggins at

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at
Archived as:
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at

More information about the Xml-dev mailing list