Namespaces

[David Megginson]

Peter Murray-Rust writes:

 > DOCTYPEs will be problematic with WF documents from more than one namespace.

Only if one particular namespace proposal is accepted.

Personally, I (and many others) believe that architectural forms
provide a much simpler, cleaner, and more powerful solution to the
namespace problem -- a document using AFs can still be validated
against a DTD, for example -- but perhaps the WG has already made up
its collective mind to the contrary.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 ak117 at freenet.carleton.ca
Microstar Software Ltd.         dmeggins at microstar.com
      http://home.sprynet.com/sprynet/dmeggins/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)