Dates in XML

Michael Kay M.H.Kay at eng.icl.co.uk
Thu Jul 9 13:13:25 BST 1998


> - it breaks the contract (implicit, I think, in both HTML
and XML) that
> the text of the document is represented by the content of
its elements


In a strict sense yes. (XML actually says "All text that is
not markup constitutes the character data of the document").
But I don't read that as saying information should be held
in its final presentation form: quite the contrary. The
whole aim is to move as far as possible towards representing
the abstract information content rather than the visible
image of the document. Therefore, dates should be held in a
canonical form.

And of course it matters not one whit whether they are held
as attributes or element content, any self-respecting XML
processor should be able to handle either. (Though I have
discovered one great advantage of using attributes is that a
SAX parser can't split them up for you - I've written lots
of buggy applications by forgetting that element content can
be split, however short it is).

Mike Kay


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)




More information about the Xml-dev mailing list