XCatalog proposal draft 0.1
James.Anderson at mecomnet.de
Mon Jul 13 16:58:00 BST 1998
John Cowan wrote:
> This is a proposal for XCatalogs, a system based on SGML/Open
> catalogs (Socats) for translating public identifiers to
> system identifiers in XML.
> 8. Open questions
> Should compliance require support for both syntaxes?
? are there mime type to identify these things, or would one trust the
extension in the resource name? or 'autodetect'?
> I think the Socat syntax is essential for backward compatibility
> with existing tools, and it is more compact (important for
> huge catalogs full of Delegate entries), but the XML instance syntax
> is more in the spirit of XML (and XSchema, etc.).
> If both syntaxes are supported, should Delegate and Extend entries
> be allowed to refer from one syntax to another,
yes: what benefit would there be from duplicating delegates / extensions?
> or should Socat
> catalogs refer only to other Socat catalogs and ditto for XML
> instance catalogs?
? what it the rational / history behind pruning the search at the first
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev