SimonStL at classic.msn.com
Wed Jul 15 17:19:31 BST 1998
DM> > The disadvantage is that management becomes difficult when there are
DM> > dozens (or hundreds) of small code fragments rather than one large one
LB>> That is the web in general, so folks are used to it.
SC>People are becoming more and more aware of the enormous cost involved,
SC>however. Saying Web folks are just "used to it" is adding to an already
I agree with Steven Champeon - let's not get into the habit of allowing costly
management strategies just because they're already employed in the impromptu
world of HTML or the more (and less) structured world of SGML. XML already
has a difficult enough burden to carry as its inheritance.
I had the pleasure of working with someone who kept track of 10,000 pages and
their dependencies in her head. There were basic rules, but she could keep
track of the (many) exceptions as well. If only I could find a product that
did nearly as good a job as she did, then maybe these issues wouldn't be so
critical. Until then, I'd rather not see them shrugged off.
I would _much_ rather see efforts to encourage Web developers to move to XML
because of its ease of use than "well, it's not any worse". XML may be
skyrocketing in anouncements for data applications, but getting Web developers
to use it on its supposed killer app is going to take a lot of further
development and consideration for the needs of that application.
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev