XSchema Finalization - Attribute Default Value as Element? (2)

[Simon St.Laurent]

Carl Hage proposed:
>Though it's not as important for AttValue to be an element, I think for 
>improved extensibility and the ability to attach documentation, <AttValue> 
>should be restored, with Doc? added, e.g.
>
> <!ELEMENT XSC:AttDef (XSC:Doc?, XSC:More?, XSC:EnumerationValue*, 
> XSC:AttValue?)>
>
> <!ELEMENT XSC:AttValue Doc?>

I'd add XSC:More as well, of course...

Right now the AttValue is an attribute, not a subelement.  This is handier for 
typing, but less convenient for documentation.  Opinions?

More to come...

Simon St.Laurent
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)