XSchema Finalization - Attribute Default Value as Element? (2)
SimonStL at classic.msn.com
Sun Jul 26 18:05:22 BST 1998
Carl Hage proposed:
>Though it's not as important for AttValue to be an element, I think for
>improved extensibility and the ability to attach documentation, <AttValue>
>should be restored, with Doc? added, e.g.
> <!ELEMENT XSC:AttDef (XSC:Doc?, XSC:More?, XSC:EnumerationValue*,
> <!ELEMENT XSC:AttValue Doc?>
I'd add XSC:More as well, of course...
Right now the AttValue is an attribute, not a subelement. This is handier for
typing, but less convenient for documentation. Opinions?
More to come...
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev