PROPSAL: XSchema declarations and constraints
papresco at technologist.com
Thu Jun 11 01:04:26 BST 1998
Andrew Layman wrote:
> Could someone provide a crisp definition of what you mean by the term
> "metadata" in the context of this discussion.
Well, we do not speak with one voice, but I can tell you what I mean.
> I ask this for two reasons:
> 1. A commonly-offered definition ("data about data") is vacuous in
> actual practice, if not conditioned by further information, since it
> indicates no operational or essential distinction between metadata and any
> other kind of data.
That's true. In our discussion the data is "a schema" and so in my
opinion, the metadata would be "information about the schema." Since I
have urged that we should separate information about types (known
elements, attributes and their semantics) from information about
constraints (how they may be used), I have also urged that we should keep
their metadata separate: "information about types" vs. "information about
BTW, XML conflates types (specified in dictionaries) and constraints
(specified in schemas), and the namespaces spec. does also. This causes
much of the confusion and (unnecessary) argumentation about that spec.
> 2. I actually think that there is a valid use of the term "metadata,"
> but I notice that the same word is used in different contexts to mean very
> different things, so I need to know what it means _here_.
I would be glad to hear what you think metadata is.
Paul Prescod - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco
Three things are most perilous: Connectors that corrode
Unproven algorithms, and self-modifying code
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev