Another member of the family

[Michael Kay]

>> Anyone know if this has any relationship to the CDIF
>> standard, which has the same objective but currently uses
a
>> proprietary encoding (see http://www.cdif.org )?
>
>Apparently, CDIF was one of the options but they opted
>for XML.
>
If that's so then they missed the point and are about to
embark on a long process of wheel reinvention. CDIF has
spent ten years standardising the semantics of the objects
to be interchanged in a wide variety of areas: this requires
a lot of leg-work. The concrete encoding (CDIF's equivalent
to XML) is a trivial part of the standard, and the CDIF
object models could easily be remapped to XML.

Mike Kay



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)