extensibility in XSchema?
SimonStL at classic.msn.com
Sun Jun 21 22:03:14 BST 1998
Mark Anderson wrote:
>But I'd like some reassurance that when XSchema is done,
>I will *not* ever have to parse comment structures to retrieve
>metadata that the XSchema authors didn't choose to include
>in a fixed repertoire of XSchema metadata declarations.
This nightmare is precisely what we're trying to avoid. Comments are a weak
and downright bad means of providing anything more than the simplest
supporting information. XSchema is definitely an attempt to address this, and
I hope we meet your expectations. Please tell us if we don't.
>There seems to be a constant undercurrent of religion in xml-dev
>about validation vs. parsing vs. semantics, whose portent I
I think for now I'm using the term 'verification', but this too may change. I
have to admit that this is a religious war I have no interest in participating
in. It shapes the terms of the XSchema development process to a certain
extent, but I'd like to think we can keep all schools of thought happy.
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev