SDD bogus

Paul Prescod papresco at
Fri May 8 21:19:18 BST 1998

Tim Bray wrote:
> Having said that, Paul did raise a valid concern about the SDD (too bad
> this issue wasn't pointed out before the spec was frozen).  

Yes, I want to point out to those who do not know the dynamics here that I
use the word "bogus" because I was in the SIG and it is as much my fault
as anyone's that it got through. Were I talking about someone else's spec.
I would be more tactful.

 Paul Prescod  -

Can we afford to feed that army, 
 while so many children are naked and hungry?
Can we afford to remain passive, 
 while that soldier-army is growing so massive?
  - "Gabby" Barbadian Calpysonian in "Boots"

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at
Archived as:
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at

More information about the Xml-dev mailing list