SDD bogus

[Paul Prescod]

Tim Bray wrote:
> 
> Having said that, Paul did raise a valid concern about the SDD (too bad
> this issue wasn't pointed out before the spec was frozen).  

Yes, I want to point out to those who do not know the dynamics here that I
use the word "bogus" because I was in the SIG and it is as much my fault
as anyone's that it got through. Were I talking about someone else's spec.
I would be more tactful.

 Paul Prescod  - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

Can we afford to feed that army, 
 while so many children are naked and hungry?
Can we afford to remain passive, 
 while that soldier-army is growing so massive?
  - "Gabby" Barbadian Calpysonian in "Boots"

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)