A little wish for short end tags (Was: RE: SDD bogus)

[David Megginson]

Paul Prescod has quite rightly objected to a simplistic slippery-slope
argument against short end tags.  I have thought of what might be a
stronger argument: as an (unstated?) design principle, XML provides
exactly one alternative for nearly every markup item.  For example,
the following are some of the possible start tags in SGML (the
second-last one is an example of a shortref):

  "<foo>"
  "<foo/"
  "<>"
  "|"
  ""

The following are some of the possible end tags in SGML (the
second-last one, again, is a shortref):

  "</foo>"
  "/"
  "</>"
  "|"
  ""

In XML, start tags with no attributes look like "<foo>" and end tags
with no attributes look like "</foo>".  That saves a chapter or so
from every XML text, a month or so from each parser-writer's calendar,
a few days from each intro to XML course, etc. etc.

Of course, any good pedant will point out that "<foo >" (with trailing
whitespace)is a sort-of variant in XML, and that XML does provide what
might be called variant or redundant features (such as the choice of
"'" or '"' as literal delimiters, and pre-declared entities like
"&amp;" where "&#38;" would serve as well).



All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 ak117 at freenet.carleton.ca
Microstar Software Ltd.         dmeggins at microstar.com
      http://home.sprynet.com/sprynet/dmeggins/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)