Proposed process for DTDs in XML
peter at ursus.demon.co.uk
Sun May 24 21:26:39 BST 1998
At 14:48 24/05/98 -0400, Paul Prescod wrote:
[...helpful comments snipped...]
>To be honest with you, I think that correcting these flaws is a much more
>interesting project than merely rewriting the notation. The nice thing is
>that these problems can be fixed merely by *simplifying* and slightly
>redefining DTDs, not by extending them or making them more complex.
Thanks for these thoughts which give a useful new perspective. I think
that they should form part of the first batch of questions, on which the
next batch should be based. For the cohesion of the community I think it's
important that the current DTD-approach can coexist with whatever comes out
of the present proposal (yes, we need a name :-).
As always we need to avoid things getting too complex.
Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev