Proposed process for DTDs in XML

[Paul Prescod]

Peter Murray-Rust wrote:
> 
> Agreed we need one. This was purely shorthand - I have no strong feelings.
> I think that this should carry the idea of a DTD rather than a schema as
> hopefully that will unite people across the spectrum.

Could you please expand on this point?

I would have thought the opposite: schemata are relevant from documents to
databases to architecture. The word "DTD" is specific to a particular
language (SGML) and carries a set of technical connotations that are not
(IMO) appropriate when you want to look at the larger picture.

 Paul Prescod  - http://itrc.uwaterloo.ca/~papresco

"You have the wrong number."
"Eh? Isn't that the Odeon?"
"No, this is the Great Theater of Life. Admission is free, but the 
taxation is mortal. You come when you can, and leave when you must. The 
show is continuous. Good-night." -- Robertson Davies, "The Cunning Man"

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)