Name for XML DTDs

[Marcus Carr]

Lisa Rein wrote:

> > An XML DTD in current DTD syntax doesn't need a new name at all,
> > of course -- XML DTD is fine.
>
> yes seriously.  what's wrong with XML DTDs?

Nothing, as long as you're using it to refer to the current syntax of a DTD. If
it was used for the XML version, it would cause confusion differentiating between
an SGML DTD and an XML DTD, for instance.

> let's not coin a phrase for the sake of itself :-)

Why not? It's a proud tradition in the IT industry ... :-)

How about XROD (rendition of declarations)?


--
Regards

Marcus Carr                  email:  mrc at allette.com.au
_______________________________________________________________
Allette Systems (Australia)  email:  info at allette.com.au
Level 10, 91 York Street     www:    http://www.allette.com.au
Sydney 2000 NSW Australia    phone:  +61 2 9262 4777
                             fax:    +61 2 9262 4774
_______________________________________________________________



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)