SGML/XML 98 Paris, another take
murata at apsdc.ksp.fujixerox.co.jp
Tue May 26 10:10:55 BST 1998
Simon North wrote:
> Namespaces: no-one is happy about namespaces. Maybe I should leave it
> to Jon himself to speak his piece, but in the panel session on the
> current status of the standards (SGML + XML) he said that XML was
> almost stopped in its tracks by the W3C because other working groups
> claimed that the XML group was not giving them what they needed.
> Namespaces was more or less forced on them (he didn't actually say
> the words 'ad hoc solution' but that was the flavour) and there are
> a lot of problems with it.
I am quite happy with the current working draft of the namespace mechanism.
Although I am not entirely happy, I would say I am happier with the namespace
than I am with XML 1.0. It is true that many issues are remaining and they are
left to the schema extension, but the namespace extension is a great step,
as I see it.
Fuji Xerox Information Systems
Tel: +81-44-812-7230 Fax: +81-44-812-7231
E-mail: murata at apsdc.ksp.fujixerox.co.jp
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev