XSD: Proposed Goals, Rev. 3
SimonStL at classic.msn.com
Thu May 28 19:09:39 BST 1998
Dan Brickley wrote:
>If  is to mention metadata, it might be worth ammending  to
>explicitly say "regarding XML and the RDF data model." (or "RDF metadata"
>or similar phrase).
You're right about this, though it's an issue I had hoped to avoid at this
stage of the game. The kind of metadata we've been talking about here is
descriptive information - documentation - not the more complete information
RDF provides. Nonetheless, I don't want collisions.
This will be one of the key questions asked in the next phase of the
discussion. I consider RDF one of the "W3C recommendations regarding XML" and
don't think this needs to be stated explicitly. Others may feel differently,
and I'd like to hear suggestions.
Dynamic HTML: A Primer / XML: A Primer / Cookies
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev