peter at ursus.demon.co.uk
Wed Nov 11 23:06:40 GMT 1998
At 22:46 10/11/98 -0500, Tyler Baker wrote:
>It is nice to see that they are supporting SAX as well. I think the
question now with XML tools in regard to
>SAX is "who does not support SAX"?
Agreed - the SAXogenists on this list can take a warm feeling away.
Remember that there were people who warned us "SAX is a waste of time" -
this is a W3C activity... The same could be said of XSchema. There seems
now to be no reasons why (after testing) we shouldn't see XSchema become
widely used for authoring/editing/validating. It's there - it does a useful
job - let's see it included in all the major tools.
Peter Murray-Rust, Director Virtual School of Molecular Sciences, domestic
VSMS http://www.nottingham.ac.uk/vsms, Virtual Hyperglossary
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev