Internal subset equivalent in new schema proposals?

[Don Park]

>I think inline schema is absolutely pernicious in such applications (which
>is the area I am currently working in). The idea that a content author can
>subvert the intentions of the content designer by modifying the schema on a
>per-instance basis is too horrible to contemplate. There is an application
>(perhaps in the set top box) that thinks it understands the structure of
>things like the electronic programme guide, and that therefore relies on
>today's guide conforming to the same schema as yesterday's.


IMHO, set top boxes designed with preconceived program structures will fail
to attract the interests of production houses and the audience.  I would
prefer to give creative artists a clean canvas to work with than forcing
them to 'color-by-number'.  Also, TV producers, the ultimate control freaks,
will not accept the harness given them by the DTD designers.

Don



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)