Internal subset equivalent in new schema proposals?

[Ronald Bourret]

Paul Prescod wrote:

> Argh. Documents are data. The dichotomy is in your head. Doesn't XML
> itself makes this abundantly clear?

Documents might be data, but the dichotomy is not just in our heads.  XML 
has a clear bias towards linear, prose-oriented verbiage.  How else to 
explain mixed content, the significance of order (as opposed to nesting), 
and the lack of basic data typing?  Fortunately, XML is proving itself to 
be a good way to transport the kinds of data many of us think of when we 
hear the word "data".

-- Ron Bourret


xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)