Questions on DCD

[david at megginson.com]

John Cowan writes:

 > Olivo Miotto wrote:
 > 
 > > 2) I can understand that compatibility with RDF is a noble target,
 > > but I think the interchangeability of Elements and Attributes (DCD
 > > section 2.1.2) clouds the water, making it more difficult to process
 > > DCD files. I would rather the syntax="explicit" form be the only way
 > > of specifying DCD. The remainder of my questions assume this
 > > form.
 > 
 > I agree.  

As do I -- the interchangeability of attributes and elements is an
unnecessarilty icky part of DCD, whatever the excuse.


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david at megginson.com
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)