Deployability of XMLised HTML - authoritative survey?

[John Cowan]

Dan Brickley wrote:

> I'd very much like to hear that these anecdotes are true, and that
> someone somewhere has undertaken a more comprehensive survey of browser
> behaviour. I guess something like this must be going on in the
> HTML-futures area -- if so a URL pointer would be very much appreciated.

Well, I can say that Netscape 4.06, IE 4.01, and Lynx 2.7, all on
Windows NT 4.0 SP3, are "XHTML-compliant" using the <BR /> trick.

This hardly constitutes a comprehensive survey, of course, but
have others datapoints to add?  Maybe we can *make* a survey.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan at ccil.org
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)