Content v. attribute
cowan at locke.ccil.org
Mon Oct 26 19:01:29 GMT 1998
Rick Jelliffe wrote:
> If you are using DTDs,
> then NOTATION attributes and ENTITY attributes fit in there too.
Indeed, the *concept* of notation attributes ("The content of this
element has some private syntax designated by this name") and
entity attributes ("This element is a surrogate for some non-XML
object which logically ought to be inserted here") make sense
even when not expressed in a markup declaration.
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan cowan at ccil.org
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! 'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev