Content v. attribute
david at megginson.com
david at megginson.com
Tue Oct 27 14:20:04 GMT 1998
Don Park writes:
> In other words, why not treat attributes as a specific type of
> child element: unique and childless?
Actually, that might complicate processing far more than you think:
1. Attributes are inherently unordered and have no position relative
to the element children; for any kind of iteration, you would have
to provide fake positions for them and develop a rule to make those
positions consistent across different processors (if you're
thinking of specifying that they be sorted in alphabetical order,
remember the L10N issues).
2. Attributes are often meant to be ignored unless needed. For
example, if I have
<!ATTLIST section
html NMTOKEN #FIXED "div"
id ID #REQUIRED
security (public|confidential) "public"
status (draft|released) "draft">
and then
<section id="foo">
<title>Small Section</title>
<para>This is a small section.</para>
</section>
do I really want to have to iterate through 'html', 'id',
'security', and 'status' as well as 'title' and 'para' as my
children?
All the best,
David
--
David Megginson david at megginson.com
http://www.megginson.com/
xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)
More information about the Xml-dev
mailing list