XML *should* be boring

[Don Park]

>If we do our job as well as the TCP/IP people did, users should hardly
>notice that XML exists -- after all, we're supposed to help them do
>their work, not draw attention to our own.


I agree entirely from engineering point of view.  However, there are times
when absurd notions are needed to get things going.  XML must serve as a
rallying point, a waving flag, national anthem, a cure-all, an extra sticker
on the box, a true-blue hype of the decade so that the bull#$@# will be
spread evenly across the horizon and fertilize the soil for things to come.

Most things we take for granted now have gone through a great deal of hyping
as if going through a rites of passage.  It happened with TCP/IP and it is
happening with XML.

Best,

Don Park



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)