Namespaces Revisited...

[John Cowan]

Rick Jelliffe wrote:

> The ISO HTML is in fact already created.

Ah, I didn't know it was an International Standard already.

> On the issue of whether W3C is a standards body, I think W3C has been pretty
> scrupulous to call their technologies "specifications" not "standards".

"Recommendations", no?

> But it is quite possible for a committee to stifle comments, even if they are
> good.  To call it "politics" is just to say that technologies
> exist in the human world, where there are high stakes in the direction
> of technology.

Granted.  But AFAIK the comments still have to be considered and
replied to, even if the reply amounts to "This idea is terminally
stupid".  They can't be burked entirely.  I am not accusing the
XML WG of doing anything of the sort, merely pointing out that
W3C committees *can* do that, and by the terms of their chartering
represent the consortium members, not the general public.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan at ccil.org
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)