Mix encodings in a document?

[Deke Smith]

John Cowan, cowan at locke.ccil.org said on 9/23/98 10:02 AM:

>ISO-10646-UCS-2 is near enough UTF-16; UTF-16 only implies that
>surrogates are correctly processed, and decent UCS-2 implementations
>will at worst leave surrogates alone.

And what is the implications of this (if any) for XML rendering? I'm not 
sure of what you mean by "surrogates are correctly processed."

Thanks for everyone's answers. They have helped.

-----------------------------------------------------------------
Deke Smith
Tallent Communications Group, Brentwood TN
deke at tallent.com, 615-661-9878
-----------------------------------------------------------------
" The best way to predict the future is to invent it. " 
       - Alan Kay 



xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)