MIME/RFC822 <-> XML interop (was RE: Binary Data in XML)

[John Cowan]

Jonathan A. Borden wrote:

> So what you are saying here is that the use of a attribute is totally
> compatible with the use of NOTATIONs and when DTDs are used both are useful.

Just so.

> I suggest that xml:content (or xml:content-type) be used instead of xml:mime
> because MIME has lots of potential headers.

I agree.

[example snipped]

> Is this reasonable?

Yes.

-- 
John Cowan	http://www.ccil.org/~cowan		cowan at ccil.org
	You tollerday donsk?  N.  You tolkatiff scowegian?  Nn.
	You spigotty anglease?  Nnn.  You phonio saxo?  Nnnn.
		Clear all so!  'Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)