Between raw and cooked II: Are? DTDs are just for validation

[David Megginson]

Jonathan Borden writes:
 > David Megginson wrote:
 > >
 > >There *is* a potentially nasty problem lurking here: the DTD may
 > >contain default values for attributes as well as validation
 > >information.
 > 
 >     If DTDs *were* only for validation...

As was probably clear from the rest of my message, the subject line
was meant to read "DTDs are not just for validation".


All the best,


David

-- 
David Megginson                 david at megginson.com
           http://www.megginson.com/

xml-dev: A list for W3C XML Developers. To post, mailto:xml-dev at ic.ac.uk
Archived as: http://www.lists.ic.ac.uk/hypermail/xml-dev/ and on CD-ROM/ISBN 981-02-3594-1
To (un)subscribe, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
(un)subscribe xml-dev
To subscribe to the digests, mailto:majordomo at ic.ac.uk the following message;
subscribe xml-dev-digest
List coordinator, Henry Rzepa (mailto:rzepa at ic.ac.uk)